UK school pupils WILL wear face masks if local area in lockdown 

Thousands of secondary pupils will have to wear masks at school after yet another education U-turn.

With just days to go before children return, Education Secretary Gavin Williamson last night said face coverings will be compulsory in the communal areas of schools covered by local lockdowns.

A decision on whether to wear masks in other schools will be left to individual heads. 

The move will be seen as a sop to unions and came hours after the Government said it had no plans to require their use.

The eleventh-hour U-turn followed new advice from the World Health Organisation at the weekend. 

Mr Williamson said last night: ‘Our priority is to get children back to school safely. At each stage we have listened to the latest medical and scientific advice.

Education Secretary Gavin Williamson last night said face coverings will be compulsory in the communal areas of schools covered by local lockdowns. Pictured, Prime Minister Boris Johnson during his visit to Appledore Shipyard in Devon on Tuesday

‘We have therefore decided to follow the World Health Organisation’s new advice. In local lockdown areas children in year seven and above should wear face coverings in communal spaces.

‘Outside of local lockdown areas face coverings won’t be required in schools, though schools will have the flexibility to introduce measures if they believe it is right in their specific circumstances. 

‘I hope these steps will provide parents, pupils and teachers with further reassurance.’ The Department for Education said the rules would also apply in sixth-form colleges and universities.

But Tory MP Marcus Fysh described the decision as ‘utterly wrong’. 

He said: ‘The country should be getting back to normal, not pandering to this scientifically illiterate guff.’

The volte-face came hours after Scotland said secondaries would receive ‘obligatory guidance’ that pupils should wear face coverings when moving around schools. 

Some teaching unions leapt on the Scottish move to pressure ministers.

Katherine Birbalsingh, head of the Michaela Community School in Wembley, north-west London, tweeted that 'masks mean mayhem'. Pictured, on Monday pupils from Bloomfield Collegiate School in Belfast were back in school for the first time since March

Katherine Birbalsingh, head of the Michaela Community School in Wembley, north-west London, tweeted that ‘masks mean mayhem’. Pictured, on Monday pupils from Bloomfield Collegiate School in Belfast were back in school for the first time since March

Geoff Barton, general secretary of the Association of School and College Leaders, called for the U-turn to be ‘sooner rather than later.’ However, other heads voiced worries. 

Paul Whiteman, general secretary of school leaders’ union NAHT, said: ‘This will undoubtedly come at an additional and unforeseen cost, and may result in shortages as demand increases. 

‘The Government needs to guarantee that enough masks will be available to schools and that the costs of getting hold of them are met in full and without delay.’

Meanwhile, Katherine Birbalsingh, head of the Michaela Community School in Wembley, north-west London, tweeted that ‘masks mean mayhem’.

Professor Russell Viner, a member of the Government's Scientific Advisory Group on Emergencies, previously said 'there is very little evidence for the use of masks in schools'. Pictured, pupils at St Paul's High School in Glasgow on August 12

Professor Russell Viner, a member of the Government’s Scientific Advisory Group on Emergencies, previously said ‘there is very little evidence for the use of masks in schools’. Pictured, pupils at St Paul’s High School in Glasgow on August 12

‘[Pupils] will be pulling at each other’s masks, repositioning their own masks constantly, bullying each other over choice of mask etc,’ she predicted. 

‘Add that to rise in chatter because teachers will not be able to hold kids to account for talking.

‘Kids will wear dirty reused masks. They will share masks. They will spit in each other masks and lick them for a joke.’ Ian Noon, of the National Deaf Children’s Society, said masks would present serious challenges for deaf pupils who need to read lips. 

‘For some, there may be little point in them even attending school or college if they cannot understand their teachers and classmates,’ he said.

The WHO recommends children over 12 wear coverings where social distancing is difficult. It said rules should be based on whether there is widespread transmission of coronavirus in the community.

Joshua Lee disinfects tables at Queen's Hill Primary School in Costessey near Norwich, as they prepare to reopen

Joshua Lee disinfects tables at Queen’s Hill Primary School in Costessey near Norwich, as they prepare to reopen

Asked yesterday about a potential shift on the policy, Boris Johnson said: ‘If there are things we have to do to vary the advice on medical grounds, we will, of course, do that.

‘But as the chief medical officer and all our scientific advisers, have said, schools are safe.’

Professor Russell Viner, a member of the Government’s Scientific Advisory Group on Emergencies, previously said ‘there is very little evidence for the use of masks in schools’.

He told the BBC’s Newsnight: ‘I think for young children we’re very clear it is not a good idea. For teenagers, again, we don’t have the evidence this is useful.’  

Q&A 

What does the science say?

Experts insist there is no strong evidence that children should wear masks in school. This is partly because most schools have been closed for six months – preventing research taking place. Previous studies suggest masks could reduce the spread of flu and colds among older children. However the drawbacks include extremely low compliance, discomfort, breathing difficulties and overheating.

What does the World Health Organisation say?

The WHO say over-12s should follow the same mask guidelines as adults. But it stresses that schools are ‘special settings’ where other factors must be taken into account. The local rate of infection, as well as measures to enforce social distancing within the school, should be considered. The WHO also warn of ‘potential harms and adverse effects of mask wearing’ and say they could result in a false sense of security among youngsters, reducing other measures such as hand-washing.

Do masks help?

Cotton masks lower the risk of infection by 54 per cent and paper masks by 39 per cent. By introducing masks in communal areas where keeping a distance is difficult, they could reduce the spread. Public Health England research suggests that transmission in schools is rare, with youngsters far more likely to catch the virus at home. Just one in 10,000 schools experienced an outbreak when they reopened in June.

Could they be harmful?

They could increase the spread of the virus in schools by harbouring the virus. Professor Russell Viner, president of the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health, said: ‘Because [younger children] touch their face and they are constantly worried about the mask, it actually could spread the virus more.’ There are also concerns masks could reduce communication, especially for children with learning disabilities or hearing.

Why not wear them in primary schools too?

Younger children are less likely to catch or transmit the virus and persuading a class of infants to wear a mask comes with difficulties. The WHO says the under-fives should not wear masks and those aged six to 11 should wear masks based on how risky the situation is, such as if they are ill or seeing elderly relatives.

What do other countries do?

Some including Denmark, the first EU country to reopen schools, don’t require masks. In France, secondary pupils wear them unless a metre apart. Some German states make masks compulsory in communal areas. In China, South Korea, Japan and Vietnam, schools require them for almost all children. Donald Trump has said he will send 125million reusable masks to US schools as they prepare to reopen.